Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Dec 18, 2016 15:17:53 GMT 10
Are you suggesting that the cahracter of Larry David and his problems in social situations is similar to me? Because if you are... Not necessarily, though I'd be surprised if you don't agree with him here:  Gonna ruin the joke and say I don't find human contact repulsive, but the thing is that I have no idea how to talk to new people (worse when they're female/attractive) |
|
|
|
Post by BluesyThug on Dec 18, 2016 15:34:20 GMT 10
Not necessarily, though I'd be surprised if you don't agree with him here: Gonna ruin the joke and say I don't find human contact repulsive, but the thing is that I have no idea how to talk to new people (worse when they're female/attractive) For one, you don't go out wearing something like this  |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Dec 18, 2016 15:54:45 GMT 10
Gonna ruin the joke and say I don't find human contact repulsive, but the thing is that I have no idea how to talk to new people (worse when they're female/attractive) For one, you don't go out wearing something like this Is there one that says "I steal soap from hotels"? |
|
|
|
Post by BluesyThug on Dec 18, 2016 15:55:39 GMT 10
For one, you don't go out wearing something like this Is there one that says "I steal soap from hotels"? Eh, it's close enough |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Dec 18, 2016 15:56:50 GMT 10
Is there one that says "I steal soap from hotels"? Eh, it's close enough Well one thing is illegal the other is not lol |
|
|
|
Post by BluesyThug on Dec 18, 2016 16:01:33 GMT 10
Well one thing is illegal the other is not lol How do you know stealing soap from hotels isn't illegal? |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Dec 18, 2016 16:22:06 GMT 10
Well one thing is illegal the other is not lol How do you know stealing soap from hotels isn't illegal? Well i don't think the hotels sue you for doing it. Besides, I'm pretty sure they make the guests pay for the soap costs anyways, in the bill. |
|
|
|
Post by BluesyThug on Dec 18, 2016 18:53:35 GMT 10
How do you know stealing soap from hotels isn't illegal? Well i don't think the hotels sue you for doing it. Besides, I'm pretty sure they make the guests pay for the soap costs anyways, in the bill. I suppose, but it'd be funny if they did sue and it hits the news |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Dec 18, 2016 21:52:59 GMT 10
Well i don't think the hotels sue you for doing it. Besides, I'm pretty sure they make the guests pay for the soap costs anyways, in the bill. I suppose, but it'd be funny if they did sue and it hits the news A corporation wasting money on suing costumers for stealing soap? Lol that'd be the day. |
|
|
|
Post by BluesyThug on Dec 19, 2016 0:03:59 GMT 10
I suppose, but it'd be funny if they did sue and it hits the news A corporation wasting money on suing costumers for stealing soap? Lol that'd be the day. Who knows, it may even be Trump Towers once America's economy hits rock bottom |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Dec 19, 2016 0:15:07 GMT 10
A corporation wasting money on suing costumers for stealing soap? Lol that'd be the day. Who knows, it may even be Trump Towers once America's economy hits rock bottom Never change, America. Smh |
|
|
|
Post by BluesyThug on Dec 19, 2016 0:33:28 GMT 10
Who knows, it may even be Trump Towers once America's economy hits rock bottom Never change, America. Smh Bit late to say that... if Clinton and the Democrats won the 2016 US Election, it would have been more of the same mediocrity. As Jonathan Pie said (along the lines of): America wanted a change - Clinton represented more of the same (essentially conservatism if you think about it) while Trump represented change. A scary, negative and reactionary change. But a change nonetheless. Bernie Sanders not being made Democratic nominee is the great tragedy of 2016 |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Dec 19, 2016 0:34:28 GMT 10
Never change, America. Smh Bit late to say that... if Clinton and the Democrats won the 2016 US Election, it would have been more of the same mediocrity. As Jonathan Pie said (along the lines of): America wanted a change - Clinton represented more of the same (essentially conservatism if you think about it) while Trump represented change. A scary, negative and reactionary change. But a change nonetheless. Bernie Sanders not being made Democratic nominee is the great tragedy of 2016 It's not like nobody knew America was a failing country politically anyways. |
|
|
|
Post by BluesyThug on Dec 19, 2016 0:59:19 GMT 10
Bit late to say that... if Clinton and the Democrats won the 2016 US Election, it would have been more of the same mediocrity. As Jonathan Pie said (along the lines of): America wanted a change - Clinton represented more of the same (essentially conservatism if you think about it) while Trump represented change. A scary, negative and reactionary change. But a change nonetheless. Bernie Sanders not being made Democratic nominee is the great tragedy of 2016 It's not like nobody knew America was a failing country politically anyways. Well yeah, aside from the politically naive general population |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Dec 19, 2016 1:00:16 GMT 10
It's not like nobody knew America was a failing country politically anyways. Well yeah, aside from the politically naive general population What do you mean politically naive? I think all Americans are pretty political just to varying degrees. |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Dec 19, 2016 1:01:02 GMT 10
It's not like nobody knew America was a failing country politically anyways. Well yeah, aside from the politically naive general population Yeah I don't think that's fair to generalise a nation like that. |
|
|
|
Post by BluesyThug on Dec 19, 2016 1:24:12 GMT 10
Well yeah, aside from the politically naive general population Yeah I don't think that's fair to generalise a nation like that. I'm not talking about America specifically. I'm talking about in general. The general public of virtually every country doesn't give a shit about politics - and is often shockingly ignorant when it comes to that. |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Dec 19, 2016 1:28:30 GMT 10
Yeah I don't think that's fair to generalise a nation like that. I'm not talking about America specifically. I'm talking about in general. The general public of virtually every country doesn't give a shit about politics - and is often shockingly ignorant when it comes to that. I suppose human beings are generally quite impulsive. It's in our nature. |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Dec 19, 2016 1:29:33 GMT 10
Yeah I don't think that's fair to generalise a nation like that. I'm not talking about America specifically. I'm talking about in general. The general public of virtually every country doesn't give a shit about politics - and is often shockingly ignorant when it comes to that. Depends, I think everyone was very political in at least this 2016 US election though. |
|
|
|
Post by BluesyThug on Dec 19, 2016 1:36:22 GMT 10
I'm not talking about America specifically. I'm talking about in general. The general public of virtually every country doesn't give a shit about politics - and is often shockingly ignorant when it comes to that. Depends, I think everyone was very political in at least this 2016 US election though. Perhaps, though keep in mind that in the US, they don't have compulsory voting, and as far as I know turnout wasn't very high as a result |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Dec 19, 2016 1:42:19 GMT 10
Depends, I think everyone was very political in at least this 2016 US election though. Perhaps, though keep in mind that in the US, they don't have compulsory voting, and as far as I know turnout wasn't very high as a result Compulsory voting may not be a thing but everyone still had an opinion on the election at least. |
|
|
|
Post by BluesyThug on Dec 19, 2016 1:51:18 GMT 10
Perhaps, though keep in mind that in the US, they don't have compulsory voting, and as far as I know turnout wasn't very high as a result Compulsory voting may not be a thing but everyone still had an opinion on the election at least. I wouldn't quite say everyone - after all only 55 percent of the population actually voted - but yeah it was definitely more divisive than any previous election in modern times |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Dec 19, 2016 1:53:14 GMT 10
Compulsory voting may not be a thing but everyone still had an opinion on the election at least. I wouldn't quite say everyone - after all only 55 percent of the population actually voted - but yeah it was definitely more divisive than any previous election in modern times I think people didn't vote because they already knew who would win—Hillary, which turned out to be wrong. |
|
|
|
Post by BluesyThug on Dec 19, 2016 1:58:27 GMT 10
I wouldn't quite say everyone - after all only 55 percent of the population actually voted - but yeah it was definitely more divisive than any previous election in modern times I think people didn't vote because they already knew who would win—Hillary, which turned out to be wrong. That's a ridiculous hypothesis and is anyone actually did that for that reason then they're fucking morons. Every vote counts - especially in a nation that doesn't have preferential voting in place. I seriously doubt that the majority of people that didn't vote did so for that reason |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Dec 19, 2016 22:35:29 GMT 10
I think people didn't vote because they already knew who would win—Hillary, which turned out to be wrong. That's a ridiculous hypothesis and is anyone actually did that for that reason then they're fucking morons. Every vote counts - especially in a nation that doesn't have preferential voting in place. I seriously doubt that the majority of people that didn't vote did so for that reason Dude, think about it. If I live in California and I'm a Republican, there's no point in going out and voting. Same if I'm a Democrat in Alabama, America's "winner take all" system makes it so that if people live in a state with a different majority political opinion than theirs, it doesn't matter if they vote or not. I mean think about it, what are the chances that California would've gone Trump or Alabama go Hillary even if I voted or not? |
|
|
|
Post by BluesyThug on Dec 19, 2016 22:58:44 GMT 10
That's a ridiculous hypothesis and is anyone actually did that for that reason then they're fucking morons. Every vote counts - especially in a nation that doesn't have preferential voting in place. I seriously doubt that the majority of people that didn't vote did so for that reason Dude, think about it. If I live in California and I'm a Republican, there's no point in going out and voting. Same if I'm a Democrat in Alabama, America's "winner take all" system makes it so that if people live in a state with a different majority political opinion than theirs, it doesn't matter if they vote or not. I mean think about it, what are the chances that California would've gone Trump or Alabama go Hillary even if I voted or not? If everybody had that attitude and did just that, then there may very well be an upset.... |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Dec 19, 2016 23:05:32 GMT 10
Dude, think about it. If I live in California and I'm a Republican, there's no point in going out and voting. Same if I'm a Democrat in Alabama, America's "winner take all" system makes it so that if people live in a state with a different majority political opinion than theirs, it doesn't matter if they vote or not. I mean think about it, what are the chances that California would've gone Trump or Alabama go Hillary even if I voted or not? If everybody had that attitude and did just that, then there may very well be an upset.... The majority of California supports the Democrats, there's no chance the very small percentage of registered Republicans would be able to flip that. |
|
|
|
Post by BluesyThug on Dec 19, 2016 23:43:32 GMT 10
If everybody had that attitude and did just that, then there may very well be an upset.... The majority of California supports the Democrats, there's no chance the very small percentage of registered Republicans would be able to flip that. If the majority of California supports the Democrats, then why is it that the Republicans often win the position of Governor there - as seen with Arnold Schwarzenegger |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Dec 19, 2016 23:52:10 GMT 10
The majority of California supports the Democrats, there's no chance the very small percentage of registered Republicans would be able to flip that. If the majority of California supports the Democrats, then why is it that the Republicans often win the position of Governor there - as seen with Arnold Schwarzenegger That's usually the case in most states, you'll see that West Virginia is very democratic when they elect their governors. Maybe it's something to do with the fact that California has a whole is Democrat, but regionally speaking there's a lot of regions that are highly Republican. Like Virginia. Northern Virginia is solidly dem while southern Virginia is solidly Rep. Since more people live in the North they usually tend to go Democrat for the presidential elections but because of the division in the regions there's always a lot of Republican governors/senators elected as well. |
|
|
|
Post by BluesyThug on Dec 20, 2016 0:06:22 GMT 10
If the majority of California supports the Democrats, then why is it that the Republicans often win the position of Governor there - as seen with Arnold Schwarzenegger That's usually the case in most states, you'll see that West Virginia is very democratic when they elect their governors. Maybe it's something to do with the fact that California has a whole is Democrat, but regionally speaking there's a lot of regions that are highly Republican. Like Virginia. Northern Virginia is solidly dem while southern Virginia is solidly Rep. Since more people live in the North they usually tend to go Democrat for the presidential elections but because of the division in the regions there's always a lot of Republican governors/senators elected as well. So it's kinda like how for example in New South Wales the Liberals are currently in government on the state level, while federally Labor has the majority of the seats by far in the state |
|
Currently on the radio: "The Unforgiven" 
